Analysis on IT trends and competitive strategies, with emphasis on micro processors, computer systems and networks. Based on latest news, backed up with real data, this site intends to provide a true and realtime picture of the fast changing IT landscape. This journal strives to be accurate on facts and sharp on criticisms. You may email your opinion to sharikou@yahoo.com or post comments here, be cool and intelligent.
Freelance journalist on IT matters. Some of my writings have been published on online IT journals. Any original content on this journal is Copyrighted, but it's free for non-commercial use. Any Trademarks used on this site belong to their respective owners. Some of the pictures are links. If there is any issue with the content of this site, please email sharikou@yahoo.com .
The old LLano 3870K frags Intel Ivy Bridge i7 3770K by a healthy 40% in 3DMark 2011.
posted by Sharikou, Ph. D. @ 5/01/2012 05:08:00 PM
1 Comments:
It's too bad that the only thing AMD has going for them is integrated graphics... The i7-3770k is twice faster than the A8 3870k in pretty much every other metric.
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/37989-intel-core-i7-3770k-22nm-ivy-bridge/?page=8
Seriously, almost exactly twice faster in every metric. Twice faster in PiFast (18.4s versus 38.2s), twice faster in CineBench (7.6p vs 3.5p), twice faster in WPrime (224s vs 458s), twice faster in AIDA64 memory read bandwidth (18.8Gb/sec vs 9.3Gb/sec), twice faster in AIDA64 memory write bandwidth (19.8Gb/sec vs 9.6GB/sec), more than twice faster in Espresso Video Encode (160sec vs 420sec), twice faster in PCMark7 (6444p vs 3322p), almost twice faster in 3DMark Vantage when they're both equipped with an NVIDIA 680 (31,507 vs 17,384) and still faster in 3DMark Vantage when using IGP graphics (4358 vs 4328.)
So yeah, AMD sulked away with like three wins, Intel strutted away with about 20 wins. Sounds like a slam dunk for AMD, just like you portrayed in your news title! No bias there, none at all...
Post a Comment
<< Home